next up previous contents
Next: Performance Relative to Cramer-Rao Up: RESULTS Previous: Results for Noise-Free Condition,   Contents

The Cramer-Rao Lower Bound

We presently evaluate the performance of our estimator relative to the Cramér-Rao lower bound.

To obtain this bound, we first consider the Fisher information in the signal, defined as:
$\displaystyle J(\alpha)$ $\textstyle =$ $\displaystyle E\left[\left(\ensuremath{\frac{\partial \ln(f(\mathbf{y};\alpha))}{\partial \alpha}}\right)^2\right]$ (20)

where $f(\mathbf{y};\alpha)$ is the PDF of our chirp signal (here, we write $y(n)$ as $\mathbf{y} = [y(-(N-1)/2) ... y(N-1)/2]$) in the presence of complex additive white Gaussian noise, namely:

\begin{eqnarray*}
f(\mathbf{y};\alpha) &=&
\ensuremath{\frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi\s...
...a^2}}\sum_n
\big[(u_n - \mu_n)^2 + (v_n - \nu_n)^2\big] \Big)
\end{eqnarray*}



where $\mu_n$ and $\nu_n$ represent the real and imaginary parts of the signal, respectively, and $u_n$ and $v_n$ represent the real and imaginary parts of the signal including noise.

We assume that the noise has independent real and imaginary parts each with variance $\sigma^2$. Given the above, it may be shown that
$\displaystyle J(\alpha)$ $\textstyle =$ $\displaystyle \ensuremath{\frac{1}{\sigma^2}}\left(\ensuremath{\frac{N^5}{80}}- \ensuremath{\frac{N^3}{24}}+ \ensuremath{\frac{7 N}{240}}\right),$ (21)

where we note that in this case the Fisher information is independent of $\alpha $.


next up previous contents
Next: Performance Relative to Cramer-Rao Up: RESULTS Previous: Results for Noise-Free Condition,   Contents
Aaron S. Master 2003-02-12