Next: Time-Frequency Reassignment (Charpentier 1986,
Up: Quadratically Interpolated Phase
Previous: Existing Models for Frequency
There is a problem with the above: "exact" cubic phase
interpolation can lead to large frequency deviations (see overhead
figure).
A better solution is to assume that some of the detected phases
may have been in error (likely, given chirping effects and noise),
and are less important to match than the general frequency
trajectory:
To implement this, a least squares formulation is needed. To do
this, we use the second order spline model:
where
is the weight given to a particular "second order
basis spine"
(see overhead figure).
So, we minimize the weighted squared error:
is relative importance of phase mismatch versus
frequency mismatch.
To more explicitly formulate the problem, we can reduce it to a
least squares problem in the basis splines:
Since it may be shown that
we can convert it to a problem in which we solve for the
values:
To solve for the
values, we take the partial derivatives
of
wrt each
, and use the resulting equations
to formulate a least-squares problem (a la EE263). Solving this
problem gives the
coefficients that give the optimal
frequency / phase trajectory in terms of the
we chose
earlier.
Next: Time-Frequency Reassignment (Charpentier 1986,
Up: Quadratically Interpolated Phase
Previous: Existing Models for Frequency
Aaron S. Master
2003-02-04