The single parameter
was chosen for notational simplicity
to represent the rate of linear frequency increase in the chirp
signal. We now consider the frequencies actually represented.
Since
represents the argument of our analytic signal,
the frequencies contained correspond to
.4
Since we are in discrete time, the factor
needs to
incorporate the sampling rate and the
factor required for
representing discrete time frequency in radians per sample. Thus,
to consider the actual signal frequency in Hz, we use
(or
) where
is the
sampling frequency and
is the actual signal frequency in Hz.
Playing an analogous role to
,
is a positive constant
equal to half the linear frequency increase in Hz per sample. To
consider the actual frequencies of the signal, we thus have
.
We note that the mathematics require that the frequencies
correspond to those not observed at actual time domain samples,
but rather the frequencies at points in time between those samples
(at
). This will not present a problem, as we will
eventually use an integral approximation in our analysis whose
midpoint rule requires us to use points half way between samples
as bounds. This integral has an interval of
to
and
thus contains frequencies which are
to
or,
simplified,
to
. We may calculate the frequency bin
numbers corresponding to these values as
We presently note that
must not be so large as to cause
frequencies greater than the Nyquist frequency, namely
.
Since the maximum frequencies occur at the edges of the time
window, we have then, that
. Thus
and, recalling our comment about
and
above,
. These constraints will be important as we
progress in the proof, and so we repeat them here: