Next: Algorithm
Up: Inversion of the Magnitude
Previous: Inversion of the Magnitude
  Contents
The magnitude expression inversion method will ultimately require
that our model is valid throughout the frequency range
representing frequencies in the signal. In terms of
equation 63, we thus require that
. Solving
 |
|
|
(107) |
for
in this case shows that we require
 |
|
|
(108) |
in order for our model to be valid. We may substitute this
value into equation 15 to see that we now require
 |
|
|
(109) |
Inspecting equation 113, we may be tempted to think
that choosing very small
will allow our model to be valid for
an arbitrarily small range. But we recall that choosing
causes large error in the model, and that we can never specify
, because doing so leads to a peak narrower than
that prescribed by the Hann window transform for a quasistationary
sinusoid. Specifically, if we set
this small, we have
 |
|
|
(110) |
which corresponds to the half height width of a Hann window
transform. This is clearly not a valid model for
,
because this narrow width should only be reached when
. We may actually view the peak width requirement as a
constraint on
: it is only realistic to model
values that cause our model peak to be at least as wide as that of
a Hann window main lobe. In fact, backsolving for
while
requiring that the peak width be at least that of the main lobe
width of a Hann window transform again yields
as given in equation 113.
In summary, if choosing to model only
values that obey
equation 112, we can guarantee accuracy specified by
by applying the magnitude inversion model only when
results in a peak at least
wide. As
we will show in the next subsection, it is trivial to verify that
the
requirement is satisfied.
Next: Algorithm
Up: Inversion of the Magnitude
Previous: Inversion of the Magnitude
  Contents
Aaron S. Master
2002-10-17