Now, we apply the algorithm to nonlinear instantaneous frequency
functions using only the logic that such functions might be well
modeled as quasi-linear. In figures 18
through 21, we show exponential, quadratic,
cubic, and logarithmic frequency functions
, as well as our
system's guess of a parameter
, estimated using inversion
techniques identical to those used in the linear frequency chirp
case above. To determine how close the algorithm is to optimal for
these cases, a least squares fit of an affine function passing
through the same detected center frequency is also shown in the
third subplot (dot-dash). The corresponding
value,
,
is shown above the plot with the other estimates. All other plots
are presented in the same manner as for the linear frequency case.
We make an interesting observation that the phase inversion
approximation generally tracks the frequency trajectory more
closely than than the magnitude inversion approximation. In most
cases, we see that this approximation is within 3% of
,
showing that our blind algorithm is, in fact, nearly optimal. In
future research, we will explore the underlying cause of this
success for the phase inversion approximation.